- This is probably what I would consider the definitive site on NOT taking the experimental jab:

- This is my 2nd favorite site on the subject: 

- Nuremburg 2 Trial - Experimental Jab Is A Crime Against Humanity

- Dr Lee Merrit on bio-warfare & Weaponization of Medicine Amid Covid
In this video, Dr. Merrit points out that the virus was stronger at the beginning of the pandemic, in March 2020. The virus may be more contagious now (early 2021), but it is also may be less lethal: 

Dr. Simone Gold really covers it all here. The alternative therapies and the dangers of the Covid-19 vaccine:

Here is an interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny about the dangers of the Covid-19 vaccination:

Here is a great website created by Dr. TenPenny 

- Patholgist speaks out: https://rumble.com/vkopys-a-pathologist-summary-of-what-these-jabs-do-to-the-brain-and-other-organs.html<br>

- Interesting montage of some top experts speaking out against the vax: 

- This doctor is just as skeptical about the vaccine and Bill Gates as I am. Apparently, vaccines cannot be approved unless there is no other treatments for the illness. Could that be why the vaccine companies are hiding the info about Ivermectin? (sorry for video quality. The video sites kept deleting it ( I wonder why?), so I had to use my phone to record it directly) 

--- 7 minute video explaining the origins of the vax for the coronavirus 

--- Robert Kennedy Jr being interviewed by comedian Theo Von November 2020: Pertinent vaccine info at appox. 27minutes, then gets really interesting at 47 minutes. You may ask why Robert Kennedy Jr. goes on such random shows to share such important info? He says because the main stream media will not let him on. 

--- Robert Kennedy Jr debates vaccines: approx. 27 Minutes in is very interesting. Furthermore, he explains that today's children have to take 72 vaccines vs the 3 during the time of Polio. Polio may not have been abolished by the vaccine, but rather sanitation/hygiene etc.. Since 1989 Children have become a lot more likely to be harmed by vaccines because there are so many more vaccines. 


--- ScienceMag.Org Article on nanoparticles in the mRNA vaccine:

--- Where did the PCR Test come from (An0maly)

--- Is this virus just a really bad flu? (An0maly)  

--- Doctor warns about vaccine:

--- Nurses refuse vaccine:

--- Why is the death of the Tanzanian president who exposed the inaccuracies of the PCR tests not getting more press coverage? He died about 10 months later: 
more info here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/john-magufuli-death-african-freedom-fighter/5740438

--- List of ingredients in Maderna vaccine. Anyone know what SM-102 is?  

--- Planet Lockdown to Control Humanity (this one is more what people might call "conspiracy theory"):

--- Video Challenging "Germ Theory" 

--- Why isn't there a vaccine for AIDS by now? Herpes? 

--- Why is there so much vitamin D deficiency in the world? Is it because we don't spend enough time outside? 

--- Here is an interesting blog post by a Jewish Rabbi about how the Jews in Nazi Germany were initially lead to concentration camps because of typhus. Could this happen to people who don't take the Covid-19 vaccine? : https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2021/01/a-holocaust-of-public-health.html 

--- In my song "CoronaCoaster Blues" I have a verse that says
" Please give me liberty
or give just go ahead and please kill me
cause I won’t take a vaccine
from your evil machine
I’d rather face the guillotine
than The Coronacoaster Blues
The Coronacoaster Blues" 
I don't ever like to explain my lyrics, but I do NOT want to alienate anyone who wants to take the vaccine, with these lyrics. Again, I respect anyone else's choice on the vaccine subject. The "evil machine" is the pharmaceutical industry and anyone else who is leading "the people" away from more natural therapies because they are benefitting financially. I believe Bill Gates is part of the evil machine, but people are only as evil as we let them be. Bill Gates can't even eradicate viruses from his computer operating system, how could he help humanity with real viruses? We have to stop giving away our power and instead empower ourselves and believe in ourselves. 

--- Here are some interesting thoughts proposed by an anonymous friend of mine: 
Do some unbiased research and stop getting your info from Main Stream media and the politicians. There are some serious long term implications. They are using fear to coerce people.
Questions to Government we all should be asking....

If I get vaccinated:
1.- Can I stop wearing the mask? - No
2.- Can they reopen restaurants etc and everyone work normally?- No
3.- Will I be resistant to covid? - Maybe, but we don't know exactly, it probably won't stop you getting it
4.- At least I won't be contagious to others anymore? - no you can still pass it on, possibly, nobody knows.
5.- If we vaccinate all children, will school resume normally? - No
6.- If I am vaccinated, can I stop social distancing? - No
7.- If I am vaccinated, can I stop disinfecting my hands? - No
8.- If I vaccinate myself and my grandfather, can we hug each other? - No
9.- Will cinemas, theatres and stadiums be reopened thanks to vaccines? - No
10.- Will the vaccinated be able to gather? - No
11.- What is the real benefit of vaccination? - The virus won't kill you.
12.- Are you sure it won't kill me? - No
13.- If statistically the virus didn't kill me anyway ... Why would I get vaccinated?" - To protect others.
14.- So if I get vaccinated, the others are 100% sure I'm not infecting them? - No
So the shot does not give immunity.
Does not eliminate the virus.
Does not prevent death.
Does not guarantee you won’t get it.
Does not prevent you from getting it.
Does not stop you passing it on
Does not eliminate the need for travel bans.
Does not eliminate the need for business closures.
Does not eliminate the need for lockdowns.
Does not eliminate the need for masking.
So...what the hell is it actually doing?

- MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL, including an explaination for the Salem Witch trials, alluding to how this phenomenon could happen to the unvaccinated: 

Letter to a family member who Asks Why Would You Take Ivermectin of it's experimental, but not take the mRNA vaccines now that they are approved: 
Here is why I choose the experimental Ivermectin over the experimental and/or approved vackseens:

1 My Intuition Tells Me Not To and The Following Reasons Support My Intuition

2 This is a respiratory virus more comparable to the flu than to Polio or Small Pox. We keep vacksenating for flu every year and I don’t think this virus will be any different.

3 Why was Bill Gates so excited about this? Why did anyone listen to him when he’s not a doctor? Where did Bill Gates go now?

4 We’ve been organic non gmo for 20 years. Do you trust the EPA when comes to “Round Up” and other opinions used in our agriculture?

5 It is now pretty well accepted that this virus came from a lab. When will another virus leak from a lab? Will we have to go through this process every time?

6 My intuition says something’s wrong with the FDA approval. The FDA has messed up many times in the past and why do some medicines take decades to approve, such as marijuana?: https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/fda-approved-prescription-drugs-later pulled-from-the-market/

7 I don’t want to all the people making money off these vackseens such as Donald Trump, Dr Fauci, Bill Gates (the list goes on) any richer than they already are. Ivermeckten is not going to make any of the rich richer….

8 I have treated my clinical Depression with Vitamin D, Fish oil etc. I like to treat the cause and not just mask the symptoms. Yes, some people may need pharmaceuticals, but not everyone.

9 As far as I know, the mRNA technology has never used in humans before and all the animal trials were devastating.

10 Why do we trust the FDA? When Trump was elected half of the country said it was Russia Collusion. When Trump was voted out the other half of the country said we have a rigged election system. What are people supposed to believe in when the entire country seems to distrust even our election system, unless it works in their favor.

11 I don’t want anything to do with medications that were developed under “Operation Warp Speed”

12 Former Phfizer employee claims there is Graphene Oxide in the mRNA injections and lots of people agree. In the Moderna they call it SM-102

13 Is the Moderna injection approved? No. Why not?

14 It’s not a vackseen it’s a gene therapy
15 The vackseens were supposed to be 95% effective, now it is accepeted they are 40% effective.

15.5 The vackseens were supposed to keep people from spreading the virus. They are not.

16 Johnson & Johnson put asbestos in their baby powder: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer/⁠

17 Ivermeckten can be taken as preventative or early treatment, meaning people have a choice when and if they want to take it.

18 Ivermeckten does not have nano particles. Nano particle technology is way too new to be experimentally injected into people en masse.

19 The vackseens won’t help achieve “herd immunity” as claimed: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/herd-immunity-mythical-goal-will-never-reached-says-oxford-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR3UZDFCIL2cXGlJ5MzzWbT8RPRgRpuOscRvu_hTl2sX9CCr1kbWqv7g5zw⁠

20 Half the people didn’t care when the vackseens were experimental and now the other half don’t care that it’s approved.

21 These vackseens come with a vaccine card. Suspicious to say the least.

22 I don’t believe people were actually informed enough to give consent to being injected with these vackseens

23 Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE): Essentially some doctors fear that people will be reliant on vackseens because their immune system has been reprogrammed by the mRNA injections.

24 I’m not ready to live in a world where I’m reliant on pharmaceutical companies to give me an injection every 6 months.

25 The inventors are warning people not to take it. I won’t provide you links with their testimonies because you stated you don’t want them. I will say that when we’re moving at “warp speed” proper studies are not possible so we have to listen to the doctors immediate testimonies through alternative means of communication as the main stream is censoring information.

26 I truly believe that Ivermeckten and other known therapies have been hushed by Big Pharma so they could get emergency use authorization and therefore make tons of money off the vackseens.

27  The FDA approval of the Pfizer vaccine seems like trickery. They chnage the name to COMIRNATY on the day it was approved? That's like saying "Hi my name is Martin. Can you approve me to get into your house? Thanks! Now that I'm approved please call me Bob".

Some articles on Ivermeckten:

I'm happy to add to the list as I think of more, but I think this should suffice for now.

Would I take a regular vackseen? I’ll be honest, the more I look into all this, the more skeptical I get about vackseens, especially when listening to parents talk about their children being injured. Bottom line though, as far as I understand it, vacksenating for this respiratory Corona virus is not the answer because it will continue to mutate just as the flu does every year. So no, I’m would not be open to taking a “traditional” vackseen for this Coronavirus.

The Only Reason I don’t post this on my wall is because I don’t want to alienate any of my friends who’ve chosen to take the vackseen.

If you feel comfortable being complacent with all the vackseen mandates, that is your business. Following one's intuition should be enough reason, but we live in a world where we are taught from a young age to fall in line and submit to the will of whoever. As for me, I’ll speak my truth and object. We live in a free country and it is both of our rights. I seriously don’t have time for going around with you on this issue. You are legendary for arguing with people on Facebook and I think I have given you enough of my time. I sincerely hope you are gleaning some kind of understanding of where me and MANY other people are coming from when we object to any mandates surrounding these vackseens. There is very little hope that you will change our minds on this issue, so you’re better off trying to understand us, and work with us, than to fight us. Thanks 🙂⁠

--- Another Thought By An Anonymous Friend:
Which is the more reasonable approach a society might take in the outbreak of epidemic?
1. To quarantine the sick, and take reasonable precautions to stop those who are identified as vulnerable from contracting the illness.
2. To attempt to “control the virus” by preventing millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people.

To any society prior to 2020, it would have been obvious that the first approach is not only logical and proportionate, but the one least likely to have other unintended and highly destructive consequences. However, to my continued astonishment, many in our society not only believe that the answer is the second, but they somehow believe it to be based on established science.

Now I understand that many who support Lockdown will object to my characterization of their position. They will say that it is deliberately misleading, since it talks about healthy people, and does not mention the sick. Such objections founder, however, on this undeniable fact: Lockdowns are, by their nature, an entirely untargeted and indiscriminate approach to a health issue, and the prohibiting by law of millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people is a feature, not a bug of a policy that was untried and untested before it was first implemented by the Chinese Communist Party in January last year, then copied by many Governments around the world thereafter.

For some reason, many Lockdownists seem to think that the onus is on Lockdown opponents to disprove their position. But as Dr Malcolm Kendrick points out in his excellent piece – Does Lockdown Work or Not, this is the opposite of how things are supposed to work:

“The starting point, for any scientific hypothesis, is for the proponents to disprove the null hypothesis. Demanding that those who believe something may not work, to prove that it doesn’t, is to turn the scientific method upside down. You can never prove a negative.”

Even so, he goes on to point out that most of the countries with the highest deaths per million are those which had fairly stringent Lockdowns, and therefore the data so far most certainly does not show that Lockdowns are effective, even on their own terms. Of course, Covidian Logic always has an answer to this, which is that these Lockdowns weren’t real Lockdowns. They were too little, too late, too soft, too lenient, too short, too small, too purple or something like that! But they can never be wrong. Low death rates show they work. High death rates show they would have worked if only people hadn’t been bad.

But the main point I wish to make about them is that they are not something that has been proposed, studied or trialed before, but are an entirely new practice, foisted upon the world for the first time in 2020. Which means what? It means that they are an experiment in real time. It means that our society (along with many others) has for the last year, and continues to be for the foreseeable future, subject to an experiment. In fact, the largest psychological, social and experiment ever conducted.

When I use this sort of language, it tends to meet the following mocking response: “So are you saying it’s all a mass conspiracy? Who’s the puppet-master then?” But this just misses the point. It does not need some Dark Lord sitting over all of it in order to be an experiment, although it has to be said that the likes of Professor Schwab do seem keen on putting themselves forward as pretty good candidates. No, it simply is by definition a psychological, social and economic experiment by the very nature of the fact that the mass quarantining and mass masking of millions of people, which cannot fail to change the psychology, society and economy, are untried, untested methods, based merely on hypothesis, and not on hard data. In fact, the data is still coming in from this enormous experiment, but as Dr Kendrick says, it doesn’t actually look good for the hypothesis:

“…I would conclude that the observational studies had – thus far – failed to disprove the null hypothesis. In fact, the evidence up to this point could suggest that lockdowns may actually increase the death rate. In short, I would look for another idea.”

But the psychological, social and economic experimentation are by no means the end of it. We have now moved on to the medical experimentation, by which I mean the giving of so-called “vaccines” to millions of people (so-called because they don’t actually stop people getting the virus, and it is not yet known whether they prevent transmission).

Incredibly, if you look at the Pfizer BioNTech SE Clinical Study Trial on the US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials database, you will notice something very odd, which is that the Estimated Study Completion Date is on January 31st 2023. This is:

“the date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events.”

In other words, the medium to long-term side effects of this product cannot possibly be known, because the study is still ongoing. The long and short of it, as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi points out in this excellent interview (watch it soon before the YouTube Gatekeepers scrub it) is this: every single person now getting these jabs is effectively an unwitting test subject in the largest medical experiment ever carried out, having been asked to give their consent to receive a product injected into their bodies without being properly informed as to the status of the product.

Simply put, neither those administering these jabs nor those receiving them can have any idea of the potential medium to long-term consequences of these things, because the companies producing them have not completed the studies on them. And no, it is not the mark of an anti-vaxxer to be deeply concerned about this (I am not); it is just the mark of having one’s critical faculties in working order and of caring about what is being done to people – it’s called Loving Your Neighbor as Yourself.

In summary, both Lockdowns and the “vaccines” are essentially a mass experiment on humanity. The mid to long-term consequences of both are entirely unknown. Future generations will marvel at how the authorities were able to do this, but they will marvel even more at how millions of people acquiesced without much thought. None of this can possibly bode well. We need to humble ourselves and take a long hard look at what we are doing, or allowing to be done to us, as a matter of the utmost urgency.